I don't understand the late Melee early Brawl metagame comparisons. It'd be a better comparison if you used Melee's early metagame and replaced fox with sheik. I'll admit that even that comparison has Snake as the easier to play character, but it's not as ridiculous as the comparison you have.
The only mid-tier characters winning late decent-sized Melee tournaments were played by some of the best players in the game (Mango, Azen, ChuDat, HugS, etc), anything else was chaingrabbed by Sheik
(And that's not mentioning the fact that the tier list is severely outdated and the characters they won with would barely be considered mid tier by today's standard)
The only mid-tier characters winning decent-sized Brawl tournaments are being played by one of the best players in the game (Azen), everyone else is using Snake/Metaknight
And no, Link wouldn't win any major melee tournaments, not by a longshot. Unless you were Azen, and even then...
I'm going to stop posting seriously in this thread (lest I be corrected in Street Fighter 1 priority again
), because I actually enjoy Brawl. I have lots of fun playing it competitively. My value of competitive play is how much fun I have playing it competitively, because if it wasn't fun for me, I wouldn't bother. Fun is subjective, and I'd be incredibly dumb to attempt to convince any of you that you're having fun playing it when you're not. Arguing about fun has no place in a thread like this (or anywhere, but that doesn't seem to stop fanboys all across the internet), so I'll take my leave.
I play games ignoring what other people think of the game, as long as I have fun playing it. I hope you all do the same :D
Lastly, wise words from a wise old sage who alternatively goes by the name "Judge Judy"
Melee is fast-paced bull****
Brawl is slow-paced bull****